ECG
case # 1
This
was captured on telemetry on a patient admitted for altered mental status. Do
you agree with the machine that there is a premature ventricular complex (PVC)?
Figure 1 - ECG case # 1
When
you look at a "funky" arrhythmia, always remember that there must be
a unifying explanation that is causing that "funkiness". In this
first case, the arrhythmia can be explained on what happens to a premature
atrial complex (PAC)?
The
first 3 premature atrial complexes (PAC's) are easy to catch. The wide QRS
complex with a right bundle branch block or
RBBB morphology (predominantly positive QRS complex in V1) is often labeled as a premature ventricular
complex (PVC) but it is not. The
non-conducted PAC's on the last 3 complexes are challenging for those not working
in telemetry floors.
The 3 fates of a PAC. The first 3
PAC's (red arrows) which are QRS #s 2,4 and6 are conducted with a normal QRS
morphology. The 4th PAC (black arrow) which is QRS #8 is conducted with a right
bundle branch block (RBBB) configuration. The last 3 PAC's (green arrows) which
are after QRS #s 9,10 and 11 are not conducted. A PAC that conducts through the
AV node but finds the right bundle branch refractory will conduct with a RBBB
morphology (conducted with aberrancy).
ECG
case # 2 - Is this patient having frequent PVC's?
Figure 2 - ECG case # 2
The intrinsic rhythm is
atrial fibrillation with frequent wide QRS complexes (RBBB morphology) after a long
R to R cycle. The machine read it as PVC in trigeminy and ventricular
tachycardia (VT) but this is Ashman's phenomenon and the wide QRS beats are not
VT but they are aberrant beats due to the same phenomenon.
ECG case # 3 - Do you
believe the machine that the patient is having VT?
Figure 3 - ECG case # 3
When the heart rate
goes-up, VT alarm is always triggered. There is intermittent/transient LBBB as
the heart rate increases but as the rate decreases the narrow QRS would appear.
This is acceleration-dependent LBBB.
ECG case # 4 - Is that
ventricular escape?
Figure 4 - ECG case # 4
The intrinsic rhythm is
atrial fibrillation. As the ventricular rate decreases, the QRS widens (left bundle
branch block or LBBB morphology). This is deceleration-dependent LBBB.
Aberrant
ventricular conduction
A narrow QRS complex is
the considered normal and it requires highly synchronous activation of the
ventricles which is made possible though the rapidly conducting His-Purkinje
system (HPS).
Figure 5 - His-Purkinje system
The term aberrancy (aberration
or aberrant intraventricular conduction) is used to describe transient bundle branch
block (BBB) and does not include QRS abnormalities caused by preexisting BBB,
preexcitation, or the effects of drugs/electrolyte. The mechanism of aberration
can occur anywhere in the His-Purkinje system. The transient BBB is due to
impulse transmission of a supraventricular beat during period of physiologic refractoriness
and/or depressed conductivity. The supraventricular electrical impulse is
conducted abnormally through the ventricular conducting system. This results in
a wide QRS complex that may be confused with a ventricular ectopic beat or PVC
or VT (if 3 or more).
An
aberrant beat can have RBBB or LBBB morphology. Simplistically, a RBBB is recognized by a QRS duration ≥ 120 ms
with a predominantly positive portion in
V1. LBBB has a QRS duration of ≥120 ms with a predominantly negative terminal
portion in V1.
Figure 6 - V1 lead - RBBB pattern in
A and LBBB pattern in B
Aberration caused by premature
excitation (ECG case # 1)
In
the normal heart, aberration following a PAC is due to excitation prior to full
recovery of transmembrane action potential (TAP) during the period of
voltage-dependent refractoriness. The most common morphology is RBBB because of
the longer refractory period of the RBB. This is what is seen in the ECG case #
1.
Figure
7 - The RBB has a longer refractory period compared to the LBB
Here
is another example of PAC conducted with aberrancy.
Figure 8 - The rhythm is sinus with
PAC in bigeminy conducted with narrow QRS, non-conducted and conducted with
aberrancy with RBBB morphology (PAC's marked in red arrows)
Ashman's Phenomenon (ECG case # 2)
Figure 9 - Ashman's phenomenon
In
1947, Gouaux and Ashman noticed that during atrial fibrillation, when a
relatively long (R to R) cycle is followed by a relatively short cycle, the
beat that ended the short cycle will be conducted with aberrancy. The reason
for this is that the refractory period of the ventricular conduction system
varies with rate and is directly proportional to the preceding cycle; a longer
cycle lengthens the ensuing refractory period and if a considerably shorter
cycle follows, the beat ending is likely to be caught in the lengthened
refractory of one of the bundle branches.
Figure 10 - Ashman phenomenon - In
A, QRS # 3 or R3 (PAC) is conducted normally because the it is
occurred outside the refractory period of
the His-Purkinje system. In B, R3 (PAC) is conducted with aberrancy or RBBB
morphology because it landed while the His-Purkinje system is still refractory.
The lengthening of the refractory period is due to the lengthening of the
preceding RR cycle.
Rule of Bigeminy
Now that you've heard of Ashman's phenomenon and you would
assume that a long-short cycle will have an aberrant beat. Let me confuse you a
little bit. There is such a thing called the "rule of bigeminy" which says that a long R to R cycle
tends to precipitate a ventricular extrasystole or a PVC. So, a long-short
cycle sequence cannot be used to favor aberrancy or a PVC because it favors
both. To differentiate aberrancy from PVC, we are to rely on the
shape/morphology of the QRS.
V1
and V6 Morphology
Lead
II is the popular lead used in monitoring. However, we cannot use this lead in
differentiating aberrancy from a ventricular beat. The best lead/s are V1 and
V6. Yes, there can be V6 in telemetry. A six-wire system will have the V6 or
seen as Vb on telemetry boxes. V1/V6 are the best leads but if they are
not in the right location then they are
useless. Please make it a practice to check lead placement location.
Figure 11 - V1 and V6 Morphological
criteria for VT and aberrancy
ECG
case #2 had an rsR' morphology favoring aberrancy.
Figure 12 - ECG case # 2 showing
rsR' morphology in V1
Coupling
Interval
Coupling
interval refers to the interval between the wide QRS complex and the preceding
QRS of the normal beat. A fixed coupling interval favors the diagnosis of PVC
than aberrancy. ECG case # 2 had a variable coupling interval favoring
aberrancy.
Figure 13 - ECG case # 2 showing
variable coupling interval (in millisecond) as measured in V1
Aberration caused by heart rate acceleration/acceleration-dependent
aberrancy(ECG case #3)
The
refractory period of the HPS shortens as the heart rate increases. So, normal
conduction is preserved (narrow QRS during tachycardia). On the other hand,
acceleration-dependent aberration is a result of the failure of the refractory
period to shorten, or in some cases to lengthen, in response to acceleration in
heart rate.
The
effective refractory period (ERP) of the right bundle (RB) normally shortens at
a faster rate to a greater degree than that of the left bundle (LB). This
explains the more frequent RBBB aberration at longer cycle lengths (longer RR
interval) and LBBB aberration at shorter cycle lengths.
Acceleration-dependent
aberration differs in many respects from aberration in normal hearts and is a marker
of some type of cardiac abnormality. It has the following behavior:
- · frequently appears at relatively slow heart rates (less than 70beats/min)
- · often displays left bundle branch block configuration
- · appears after several cycles of accelerated but regular rate / or appears with gradual rather than abrupt acceleration of the heart rate and at CL shortening by less than 5 milliseconds
Because the changes in RR interval
is gradual, this is difficult to recognize in a short ECG strip. So, a review
of saved telemetry data will capture the transition from a narrow QRS to wide
or aberrant beats.
When
the heart slows down, the aberrancy often persist. The persistence of aberrancy
can be due concealed transeptal conduction. Normal conduction (normal QRS
duration) is seen later as the heart rate slow down more.
Figure 14 - Concealed transeptal
conduction
Aberration caused by heart rate deceleration/bradycardia-dependent
aberrancy(ECG case#4)
ECG
case # 4 is an example of bradycardia-dependent aberrancy. A LBBB-shaped QRS
can be seen as the heart rate decreased. This is not commonly seen. The most
widely accepted mechanism of deceleration-dependent aberrancy is the gradual
spontaneous reduction of the phase 4
of the transmembrane action potential in an abnormal cells or group of cells.
During the long pause, the His-Purkinje system begin to depolarize to reach
action potential. By the time a supraventricular impulse arrives, not all
His-Purkinje system is negative enough to propagate the impulse and creating an
aberrant beat.
Looking
at the V1 morphology of V1 the nadir of S is less than 60 ms.
Figure 15 - ECG case # 4 showing
nadir of S less than 60 ms favoring aberrancy
References:
Fisch C and Knoebel S.
1992 .Vagaries of Aberrancy. Br Heart J 67:16-24
Fisch C and Knoebel SB. 2000. Electrocardiography of Clinical Arrhythmia.
New York. Futura Publishing Co.
Fisch C. 1983.
Aberration: seventy five years after Sir Thomas Lewis. Br Heart J; 50: 297 -302
Fisch C., Zipes DP and
McHenry PL. 1973. Rate Dependent Aberrancy. Circ 48:714-724
Garner JB and Miller JM.
201.. Wide Complex Tachycardia – Ventricular Tachycardia or Not Ventricular
Tachycardia, That Remains the Question. Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology
Review 2(1):23–29
Goldberger A. 2013.
Goldberger’s Clinical Electrocardiography : A Simplified Approach 8Ed. Ph
Elsevier
Gouaux,
JL; Ashman, R (Sep 1947). "Auricular fibrillation with aberration
simulating ventricular paroxysmal tachycardia.". American Heart Journal 34 (3): 366–73.
Issa Z, Miller J and
Zipes D. 2012. Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology: A Comprehensive
Review - A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease 2nd Ed. PA Saunders
Marriot HJ. 1998. Pearls and
Pitfalls in Electrocardiography (2ed). MA Williams and Wilkins
Neiger JS and Trohman
RG. Differential Diagnosis of Tachycardia with a Typical LBBB Morphology. WJC
3(5):127-134
Surawicz B and Knilans
TK. 2008. Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice. 6th ed.
PA. Saunders-Elseiver
Wang K.2013. Atlas of Electrocardiography. India Jaypee Bros
#636
I am not sure who wrote this, but this is the best explanation that I have ever seen of these phenomena. Thank you very much!
ReplyDeleteThank you...
ReplyDelete