Most will thought of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) as a nuisance.
However, a PVC can unmask or help in arrhythmia diagnosis.
A PVC can unmask hiding P waves
Figure 1 - A
PVC in the middle of a regular wide-QRS complex rhythm.
It might
look like sinus tachycardia with right bundle branch block (RBBB)
Figure 2 -
Organized atrial activities or P waves are marked with red arrows
A properly-timed premature ventricular beat (PVC) can unmask
hidden P waves. The 2 P's are marked in red. The atrial rate is about 250 bpm.
When I showed this to nurses, they thought there was a block.
Yes, there is but this is physiologic block. The AV node is like a filter or
"gatekeeper". It can accommodate only certain number of beats. If it
is bombarded with a lot of supraventricular impulses, some of the impulses will
be blocked as you can see during atrial flutter or AFL (atrial rate of 250-350 bpm) and atrial
tachycardia or AT (150-250 bpm). So, during atrial flutter or atrial
tachycardia we see 2:1 or something AV block or AV conduction.
So, our mystery ECG is not sinus tachycardia.
AT vs AFL until confirmed with
electrophysiologic study
There has much argument on using the atrial rate to
differentiate tachycardias. It is not a good practice to use rate to
differentiate tachycardias.
In our case, we are stuck if we call this AT or AFl. You will
get several range from different sources. Some would say that AT is 150 - 250
bpm and AFL is 250-350 bpm. Some would say that AT is 100-240 bpm and AFL is
240-340 bpm.
TYPICAL atrial flutter will have an atrial rate of about
240-340 bpm but the atrial rate will slow down with use of antiarrhythmics (amiodarone) and
progression of atrial myopathy. Atrial tachycardia will also manifest
like atrial flutter in patients who had catheter ablation for atrial
fibrillation, maze procedure and prior cardiac surgery with atrial scar.
So, the typical saw-tooth ECG finding can also be seen in
fast AT and the presence of isoelectric baseline can be seen in slow atrial
flutter. According to Das and Zipes, "...it becomes a matter of semantics to define an AT or an atypical AFL".
Going back to the case, the ventricular rate was in the 120's because the atrial rate was around
250 bpm. There is a 2:1 AV conduction. This case can be interpreted as AT vs
AFL with 2:1 AV conduction.
Not all PVC would unmask the
arrhythmia
Figure 3 -
Not all PVC can unmask a rhythm mystery
Not all PVC can unmask a hidden P
wave
Going
further, this strip above is not much of help even if there is PVC. It is hard
to convince more than 90% of people that there is a P wave in the ST complex.
Only the geeks will be convinced.
After
several hours, a medication was given and slowed down the rate and revealed the
answer to the mystery - atrial flutter. There is group-beating suggesting there
is a Wenckebach periodicity and a probable multilevel block. Most readers would
interpret it as AFL with variable block.
The take
home message for this case:
·
Use
all leads to interpret a rhythm (full disclosure).
·
Make
use of the PVC to unmask P waves.
·
Fast
atrial rates will create a physiologic block.
Figure 4 -
Atrial flutter revealed
References:
Bonnow et al. 2011. Braunwald's Heart Disease: A
Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 9th Edition. PA.Saunders
Das and Zipes. 2012. Electrocardiography of arrhythmias
: a comprehensive review. Elsevier PA
Fisch C and Knoebel SB. 2000.
Electrocardiography of Clinical Arrhythmia. New York. Futura Publishing Co.
Goldberger A. 2013. Goldberger’s Clinical
Electrocardiography : A Simplified Approach. 8Ed Ph Elsevier
Kumar UN et al. 2006. The 12L Electrocardiogram in
Supraventricular Tachycardia. Cardiology Clinics ;24: 427-437
Prutkim JM. Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic
features of type I atrial flutter. In:UptoDate: Zimbetbaum PJ and Goldberger AL
(Ed)). UpToDate: Waltham, MA 2012
Saoudi N et al.2001. Classification of Atrial Flutter
and Regular Atrial Tachycardia According to Electrophysiologic Mechanism and
Anatomic Basis: A Statement from Joint Expert Group from the Working Group of
Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and North American Society of
Pacing and Electrophysiology. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 12:
852-866
Stahmer SA and Cowan R. 2006. Tachydysrhythmias.
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 24:11-40
Surawicz B and Knilans TK. 2008. Chou’s
Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice. 6th ed. PA.
Saunders-Elseiver
Wang K. 2013 Atlas of
Electrocardiography. India Jaypee Bros.
Wang K. 2014. ECG Self-Study Book. India Jaypee Bros.
#554
When you will be able to write something great about medical writing? The answer is if you have the knowledge of those particular subjects. The writing nephrology related paper is also the same. However, we know that no one man knows everything and we require some help from time to time in writing such papers and here https://www.fellowshippersonalstatement.com/medical-fellowship-personal-statement-services/radiology-fellowship-personal-statement/ you can find your help.
ReplyDelete